Homes.com vs Revaluate

Homes.com logo
CoStar-backed real estate portal that routes buyer inquiries directly to the listing agent — no competing agent ads on your own listings.
~$20/lead (pay-per-lead)
Revaluate logo
Revaluate applies AI scoring to an agent's existing contact database to surface who in their sphere of influence is statistically most likely to sell — eliminating prospecting guesswork without buying a single third-party lead.
From $199/mo

Homes.com vs Revaluate: feature comparison

FeatureHomes.comRevaluate
Buyer Leads✓✗
CRM Integration✓✓
Dialer / Power Dialer✗✗
Exclusive Leads✓✗
Geographic Targeting✓✗
Lead Filter / Quality Scoring✓✓
Marketing Automation✗✓
Seller / Listing Leads✗✓

Homes.com — Pros & Cons

Pros

  • "Your Listing, Your Lead" model — competitor agents cannot advertise on your own listings
  • Backed by CoStar Group data infrastructure with 100M+ monthly visitors
  • Pay-per-lead pricing (~$20–$30/lead) available with no long-term contract
  • Lead Concierge pre-qualifies inbound inquiries before routing to the agent in real time

Cons

  • Consumer brand awareness significantly lags Zillow and Realtor.com in most U.S. markets
  • Thinner listing inventory in rural and low-density markets reduces buyer-side lead volume
  • Limited built-in marketing automation and seller lead nurturing tools
  • CRM ecosystem integrations are narrower than those offered by Zillow or Realtor.com

Revaluate — Pros & Cons

Pros

  • AI scores and ranks database contacts by likelihood to sell so outreach effort is prioritized, not scattered across the full SOI
  • Database Repair identifies duplicates, stale records, and missing data before they waste marketing spend or skew scoring
  • Native integrations with 20+ real estate CRMs including Follow Up Boss, BoldTrail, Sierra Interactive, Lofty, and Wise Agent
  • Report Card grades 12 months of missed listing opportunities — surfaces specific closings the agent lost from their own database

Cons

  • No pricing is published on the website — a demo call is required to learn actual costs, making upfront budget comparisons with SmartZip or Offrs difficult
  • Results depend entirely on database quality — agents with fewer than 500 active contacts or a stale SOI will see minimal predictive lift
  • No buyer-side lead generation — the platform addresses only the seller/listing side of the pipeline, leaving buyer lead acquisition to other tools
  • Scoring insights take 60–90 days to stabilize, which frustrates agents expecting immediate pipeline impact from month one