Homes.com vs Landvoice

CoStar-backed real estate portal that routes buyer inquiries directly to the listing agent — no competing agent ads on your own listings.

~$20/lead (pay-per-lead)

Visit Homes.com

Landvoice

Landvoice delivers daily expired listing, FSBO, pre-foreclosure, and distressed-property leads to real estate agents — paired with a built-in dialer and neighborhood search for focused prospecting.

$87/mo

Visit Landvoice

Homes.com vs Landvoice: feature comparison

Feature	Homes.com	Landvoice
Buyer Leads	✓	✗
CRM Integration	✓	✗
Dialer / Power Dialer	✗	✓
Exclusive Leads	✓	✗
Geographic Targeting	✓	✓
Lead Filter / Quality Scoring	✓	✗
Marketing Automation	✗	✗
Seller / Listing Leads	✗	✓

Homes.com — Pros & Cons

Pros

"Your Listing, Your Lead" model — competitor agents cannot advertise on your own listings
Backed by CoStar Group data infrastructure with 100M+ monthly visitors
Pay-per-lead pricing (~$20–$30/lead) available with no long-term contract
Lead Concierge pre-qualifies inbound inquiries before routing to the agent in real time

Cons

Consumer brand awareness significantly lags Zillow and Realtor.com in most U.S. markets
Thinner listing inventory in rural and low-density markets reduces buyer-side lead volume
Limited built-in marketing automation and seller lead nurturing tools
CRM ecosystem integrations are narrower than those offered by Zillow or Realtor.com

Landvoice — Pros & Cons

Pros

Covers four distinct lead types (expireds, FSBOs, pre-foreclosures, distressed) in a single subscription — most rivals specialize in only one or two.
Built-in Landvoice Dialer lets agents call directly from the platform without a separate power-dialer subscription.
Neighborhood Search tool surfaces 3,000 map-based lookups per month for geographic farming, beyond simple list downloads.
Over 30 years of data infrastructure gives broad U.S. market coverage with daily data refresh on expired and FSBO records.

Cons

Leads are not exclusive — the same records are sold to multiple competing agents in the same market, eroding first-mover advantage.
No CRM is included and documented third-party CRM integrations are limited; most agents must manually export data into their existing system.
No buyer-lead component — the entire platform is seller-focused, so teams needing inbound buyer traffic must pay for a completely separate service.
Meaningful coverage of multiple lead types requires the Elite tier at $227/month, making effective cost comparable to or higher than competitors like REDX.

See all Lead Generation →