Landvoice vs Zurple

Landvoice logo
Landvoice delivers daily expired listing, FSBO, pre-foreclosure, and distressed-property leads to real estate agents — paired with a built-in dialer and neighborhood search for focused prospecting.
$87/mo
Zurple logo
An integrated lead generation + CRM platform with Facebook ad management, built for agents who want a single vendor for ads and follow-up.
$299/mo + ad spend

Landvoice vs Zurple: feature comparison

FeatureLandvoiceZurple
Buyer Leads
CRM Integration
Dialer / Power Dialer
Exclusive Leads
Geographic Targeting
Lead Filter / Quality Scoring
Marketing Automation
Seller / Listing Leads

Landvoice — Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Covers four distinct lead types (expireds, FSBOs, pre-foreclosures, distressed) in a single subscription — most rivals specialize in only one or two.
  • Built-in Landvoice Dialer lets agents call directly from the platform without a separate power-dialer subscription.
  • Neighborhood Search tool surfaces 3,000 map-based lookups per month for geographic farming, beyond simple list downloads.
  • Over 30 years of data infrastructure gives broad U.S. market coverage with daily data refresh on expired and FSBO records.

Cons

  • Leads are not exclusive — the same records are sold to multiple competing agents in the same market, eroding first-mover advantage.
  • No CRM is included and documented third-party CRM integrations are limited; most agents must manually export data into their existing system.
  • No buyer-lead component — the entire platform is seller-focused, so teams needing inbound buyer traffic must pay for a completely separate service.
  • Meaningful coverage of multiple lead types requires the Elite tier at $227/month, making effective cost comparable to or higher than competitors like REDX.

Zurple — Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Managed ads + built-in CRM for a single price
  • More accessible entry point than Ylopo
  • Automated nurture campaigns out of the box
  • No Facebook Ads expertise required on your end

Cons

  • Lead quality is market-dependent
  • Built-in CRM less flexible than Follow Up Boss
  • Limited lead quality scoring / filtering