CoreLogic Matrix CMA vs Quantarium
The CMA module built into CoreLogic Matrix MLS software — often the native CMA tool for MLSs running on Matrix.
Free via MLS
Quantarium delivers AI-powered automated valuations across 158 million U.S. properties — the same engine selected by FHFA for next-generation appraisal. Its per-report QCMA product adds computerized comparable adjustments and TerraLook condition scoring to standard AVM output.
$1.50/report
CoreLogic Matrix CMA vs Quantarium: feature comparison
| Feature | CoreLogic Matrix CMA | Quantarium |
|---|---|---|
| Automated AVM | ✓ | ✓ |
| Interactive Presentation | ✓ | ✗ |
| Market Reports | ✓ | ✓ |
| MLS Integration | ✓ | ✗ |
| Client-Facing Portal | ✗ | ✗ |
| Branded Exports | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile Access | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free via MLS / NAR | ✓ | ✗ |
CoreLogic Matrix CMA — Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Free via MLS if running on Matrix
- ✓Native integration with Matrix listing data
- ✓No separate subscription
- ✓Sufficient for basic CMA needs
Cons
- ✗Less polished than Cloud CMA
- ✗Only available if MLS uses Matrix
- ✗Limited customization and branding
Quantarium — Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Independent testing ranked its QVM the most accurate AVM in the U.S. for three consecutive years, outperforming CoreLogic, HouseCanary, and Clear Capital.
- ✓Self-service marketplace requires no sales call — per-report pricing from $1.50 for basic details to $12.99 for a full QCMA with automated comps and TerraPlot map.
- ✓TerraLook computer vision scores property condition, room quality, and damage from listing photos — a differentiated feature no mainstream CMA tool currently offers.
- ✓Covers 158 million+ U.S. properties across 3,000+ counties with 5,000+ data fields per parcel, including monthly Home Price Index updates.
Cons
- ✗Enterprise and API pricing is entirely opaque — brokerages and teams must contact sales before receiving a single cost figure.
- ✗Output is data-dense and technical, not a polished presentation; agents need a second tool to turn the valuation into a client-ready CMA report.
- ✗Review footprint is nearly absent on major platforms such as G2 and Capterra, making third-party social proof hard to find despite the product's track record.
- ✗Rural and niche property types show documented accuracy gaps; confidence intervals widen significantly outside major metro markets.
Realty Software