CoreLogic Matrix CMA vs Quantarium

CoreLogic Matrix CMA logo
The CMA module built into CoreLogic Matrix MLS software — often the native CMA tool for MLSs running on Matrix.
Free via MLS
Quantarium logo
Quantarium delivers AI-powered automated valuations across 158 million U.S. properties — the same engine selected by FHFA for next-generation appraisal. Its per-report QCMA product adds computerized comparable adjustments and TerraLook condition scoring to standard AVM output.
$1.50/report

CoreLogic Matrix CMA vs Quantarium: feature comparison

FeatureCoreLogic Matrix CMAQuantarium
Automated AVM
Interactive Presentation
Market Reports
MLS Integration
Client-Facing Portal
Branded Exports
Mobile Access
Free via MLS / NAR

CoreLogic Matrix CMA — Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Free via MLS if running on Matrix
  • Native integration with Matrix listing data
  • No separate subscription
  • Sufficient for basic CMA needs

Cons

  • Less polished than Cloud CMA
  • Only available if MLS uses Matrix
  • Limited customization and branding

Quantarium — Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Independent testing ranked its QVM the most accurate AVM in the U.S. for three consecutive years, outperforming CoreLogic, HouseCanary, and Clear Capital.
  • Self-service marketplace requires no sales call — per-report pricing from $1.50 for basic details to $12.99 for a full QCMA with automated comps and TerraPlot map.
  • TerraLook computer vision scores property condition, room quality, and damage from listing photos — a differentiated feature no mainstream CMA tool currently offers.
  • Covers 158 million+ U.S. properties across 3,000+ counties with 5,000+ data fields per parcel, including monthly Home Price Index updates.

Cons

  • Enterprise and API pricing is entirely opaque — brokerages and teams must contact sales before receiving a single cost figure.
  • Output is data-dense and technical, not a polished presentation; agents need a second tool to turn the valuation into a client-ready CMA report.
  • Review footprint is nearly absent on major platforms such as G2 and Capterra, making third-party social proof hard to find despite the product's track record.
  • Rural and niche property types show documented accuracy gaps; confidence intervals widen significantly outside major metro markets.