Asteroom vs iGUIDE
Asteroom is a smartphone-powered 3D virtual tour platform — capture immersive property tours with a $110 hardware kit, then auto-generate floor plans, video walkthroughs, and virtual staging at a fraction of Matterport's cost.
$29/mo
iGUIDE by Planitar turns a single interior scan into verified floor plans, an interactive 3D walkthrough, and room measurements — all generated automatically with no manual post-processing.
From ~$35/scan (PLANIX camera ~$2,600)
Asteroom vs iGUIDE: feature comparison
| Feature | Asteroom | iGUIDE |
|---|---|---|
| 3D Virtual Tours | ✓ | ✓ |
| Floor Plans | ✓ | ✓ |
| Media Delivery Portal | ✓ | ✓ |
| MLS Delivery | ✗ | ✓ |
| Photo Editing / Enhancement | ✗ | ✗ |
| Subscription Pricing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Video Tours | ✓ | — |
| Virtual Staging | ✓ | ✗ |
| Drone / Aerial | — | ✗ |
Asteroom — Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓A $110 camera kit plus $29/mo subscription costs 80% less than Matterport's professional scan service
- ✓Automatically generates 2D floor plans with room dimensions from every 3D scan — no additional step
- ✓Pay-per-tour option ($59/tour, 6-month hosting) suits agents shooting fewer than 3 listings per month
- ✓Built-in virtual staging lets buyers furnish empty rooms in-browser without leaving the tour
Cons
- ✗Tour resolution lags behind Matterport Pro3 and iGUIDE in large or architecturally complex properties
- ✗No direct MLS-delivery integration — agents must manually export and re-upload media to their MLS
- ✗Requires purchasing a $110 hardware kit upfront before the subscription has any standalone value
- ✗Branding customization, lead-capture forms, and guided tour scripting are limited vs. CloudPano
iGUIDE — Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Floor plan accuracy of ±0.5% distance and ±1% square footage — measurably tighter than Matterport
- ✓Single scan generates a 3D tour, accurate floor plans, room measurements, and CAD/Xactimate-compatible exports simultaneously
- ✓No subscription required — per-project pricing from ~$5 CAD; operators own their data outright
- ✓Fast capture — a typical residential property scanned in under 15 minutes with the PLANIX R1 camera
Cons
- ✗Requires purchasing the proprietary PLANIX R1 camera (~$2,600 USD) upfront before any first scan — no rental program exists
- ✗No photo editing, HDR, twilight effects, or virtual staging capability; a separate service like BoxBrownie is always needed for those deliverables
- ✗Pricing is denominated in Canadian dollars, making cost-per-scan unpredictable for US operators subject to exchange rate swings
- ✗No drone or aerial photography capability — the system is strictly limited to interior 3D capture
Realty Software